Plato on Gender: An analysis

Plato on Gender An analysisPlato on GenderPlatonic advocacy of young-bearing(prenominal) public engage custodyt as articulated in Republic V challenges an organizational ethos by which the activities, movement, and carriage of women were severely restricted. so the quality of women in Platos political philosophy is arguably at odds, non only with the negative and oppressive portrait of women in Athenian philosophical thought at large, scarce as well with the broader Platonic corpus which seems to speak to the natural inferiority of young-bearing(prenominal)s. Plato advances the radical strain that insofar as the system of rules and intellect be distinct, women and men may serve co comprisely in the commission of the state. That is, assuming that the temperament of a somebody is in drug-addicted of his/her body, and to such(prenominal)(prenominal) an extent as each individual should be assigned work suited to his character, both sexes leave alone be undefended of p er unionizeing all the functions needed by the city, including philosophy, despite the innate and un forfendable inferiority of women (Okin, 1979). Yet however progressive his embrace of women in term of their capacity to assume political, ethical, and intellectual responsibilities alongside men the evidence suggests that Plato did non stand for a liberationist philosophy that elevates women to the moral status of men. Only by examining the proposals of Republic V with an eye toward the overriding aims and structure of the ideal hunting lodge do Platos app atomic number 18nt contradictions in his views toward women become probable. term his views on women were no doubt revolutionary for the day, the degree to which Plato was motivated by an egalitarian ethic remains an ease up question. We must remember that Plato was a product of a society locked into a rigid patrimonial order in which the confinement of respectable women was de rigeur and where upper clear women were valu ed primarily as instruments of reproduction and legitimacy (Pomeroy, 1975). The Athenian wo musical composition of citizen class was secluded at heart the p arental home until she became a ward of the matrimonial household, where she was expected to performance her maternal responsibilities, in particular the breeding of sons. She was likewise controlled and deprived with respect to her sexuality, with push through the compensation of any participation in life outside the domestic battleground (Okin, 1979). Socialization with men at any level, even within the confines of the home, was not consistent with her service to the household and commitment to chastity, frugality, and relieve (Pomeroy, 1975).In conceptual terms, destinewhile, emotionalism and wish of self-control were seen as products of womanly genius reserving bra real, norms of reason, and objectivity for men within the intellectual and institutional structure ( in force(p), 1989). frankincense to the extent tha t women were devoid of moral agency and self-possession, they were subject to the authority and guardianship of men, effectively disqualifying them from the ruling class as a characterise of natural dependency. The recurrent theme in the literature is of female command and loss of autonomy as a terminus of excessive sensual indulgence women are in bondage to their physical appetites as much(prenominal) as those who are legally bound ( conscionable, 1989, p. 186). A adult female, as such, is unable to subordinate her appetites, swears, and emotions to reason (i.e. higher-order valuations) in pursuit of virtue. A man however, presuming the right socio-economic conditions, is free, and and so is arguably considerably less, if at all, inclined to fall victim to akratic action. By this reasoning, men maintain the ability to act in conformity with their decisive better judgments, while women are seen in connection to and dependent upon their appetitive urges ( politics, 1260a2 -12). Hesiods Theogony, for example, likens the woman to a gluttonous and sexually unchaste stomach inflicted on the man to consume the fruits of his labor and weaken his disrupt to self-govern, which, as a free man, he is presumed capable of (Just, 1989, p. 164). Aristotle confirms noting in the Politics that, the woman has a deliberative faculty, but that it is without authority (Politics, 1260a12-14). Correspondingly, he submits that to a woman, silence brings refinement whereas this does not apply to a man (Politics, 1260a30-31). Hence, as Just comments, the rivalry mingled with those innately possessed of self-control, and those who lack it . . . ideologically renders womens subordinated place within the sociable structure of the polis a natural oneness (Just, 1989, p. 166).Against this backdrop, it seems unrealistic to believe that Plato was immune to the influences of the historical and cultural standards that down the stairss loading his dialogues. In fact, in the Ti maeus, Plato himself explains the inferiority of women in terms of devolution from an pilot film cornerstone consisting of men. Those able to master their passions and live virtuously on Earth are granted passage back to the stars from which they came cowardly and unrighteous men are reborn as women to account for their failures. All male-born humans who lived lives of cowardice or injustice were reborn in the bet on generation as women (Timaeus, 90e7-8). Indeed victory of the rational over the irrational was the means by which a debased individual may re one shot to his original condition of excellence, and avoid kick upstairs degeneration into an animal form appropriate to the evil record which he had acquired (Timaeus, 42b1-d2).Plato continues to explain that, ultimately, procreation results from the union of the womans desire and the mans love an explanation that speaks to appetitive/reason peculiarity discussed above (Timaeus, 91d1). indeed Plato builds a hierarchy of h onorableness and rationality in which woman is positioned midway among man and beast, a sentiment echoed in the Laws (Okin 1979).The dialogue of Republic V, however, suggests that while human beings can differ in many ways, certain attributes induce no bearing on the designation of varied functions to different persons in accordance with their natures. For example, whereas a man with a full head of hair is known to be a good cobbler, the bald man is not necessarily incapable of practicing the aforementioned(prenominal) job (Republic V, 454c1-6). There seems, in that respectfore, to be no reason to consider the difference amid the sexes in terms of procreative function relevant to whether they should p reside equal roles in the guardianship of the state (Okin, 1979). Plato thereby manages to reconcile the dialectical opposition between the belief that different natures ought to accord with different pursuits, and the suggestion that the kindred pursuits be open to both sexes in spite of female inferiority. so although he asserts that women are generally less capable than men, especially in physical strength, he maintains that individual members of both sexes are capable of at the same time performing all the citys functions, including rule and defense (Okin, 1979).The collective good therefore seems to have that individual pursuits and education be in keeping with the merits of each, irrespective of sex. That women bear . . . and men beget, Plato reasons, is not tantamount to confirmation that women ought to be denied the guardian-rearing education provided to their male peers (Republic V, 454d5-12). Accordingly, Plato maintains that the guardians of his state, along with their (collective) wives, ought to enjoy the same pursuits. Just as a male and female doctor have souls of the same nature, so to would Platos purported male and female guardians (Republic V, 454c10-d1). Plato does, however, prescribe a transport share of defensive duties to wo men, in keeping with their relative physical failing and consistent with their assumed level of strength (Republic V, 455d7-e2).Thus although Plato expands the range of activities open to women, the notion (articulated in the Timaeus) that the female form embodies a wicked soul certainly calls into question Platos embrace of the egalitarian ideal as such. To be sure, Plato grounds his emancipation of women in the metaphysical assertion that the body and soul are distinct, such that the body becomes an obstacle to the ambitions and potential of the soul. If a male soul can reside in a female body and vice versa, it follows that a female with a philosophical nature may aspire to re-enter life as a man to the extent that she severs her attachment and dependence on the body in favor of philosophy ( chuck out On, 1994). In effect, since the desired quality of ones soul may be incongruous with ones sexual identity, Plato implies that manfulness is not necessarily a function of the bod y. If female refers to someone affiliated to the world on a bodily level, and male, to a person princely to a philosophical plane (Bar On, 1994), then anyone of a satisfactory nature can be considered male as a matter of statecraft.In this vein, Okin argues that Plato shared his fellow Athenians contempt for women, suggesting the emancipation of female guardians was a prerequisite byproduct of the dismantling of the family The most important consequence of Platos vicissitude of the guardian class into a single family is the radical implication it has for the role of women (Okin, 1979, p. 37). Sensing the antagonism between the state and the family, Plato seeks to disengage the guardians from all connections and motor which may chthonicmine their dedication to the state, thereby extending the primary ties of kinship end-to-end the ruling class (Okin, 1979, p. 37). Thus Rousseau points to a causal link between the abolition of the family and the granting of equal opportunities to women, such that having dispensed with the individual family in his system of government, and not knowing any longer what to do with women, Plato befalls himself forced to turn them into men (Okin, 1979, pp. 37-8). Indeed the need for unity within the ruling class which eliminated private property and the wifehood, and minimized the role of maternity is critical to the amour of women in the administration of the city. If for the female guardians the relationship to particular men, children and households has ceased to be crucial, there seems to be no alternative for Plato but to consider women as persons in their own right (Okin, 1979, p. 38).Thus the utilitarian ethic by which Platos seeks communal happiness (eudaimonia) is not built on modern notions of liberty, justice, or equivalence of the sexes. Plato appeals to the efficiency, harmony, and moral goodness on which his politics rest the oppression of women notwithstanding. Excellence, not liberty, is his goal, and he rejects liberty as the enemy of excellence (Vlastos, 1994, p. 22). The run off of women from the confines of their traditional domestic role absent a suitable outlet for the excesses of female nature would constitute a threat to well-behaved accord, leaving Plato no choice but to rethink the matter of womans role and her potential abilities (Okin, 1979). Allen, who explains Platos acceptance of women in the context of use of a political agenda that does not tolerate any agency of civil discord, and which thereby aims to eliminate potential sources of disorder in the city, as well as shares this interpretation (Okin, 1979). Arguably then, Plato intends to foster harmony and unity of purpose by resolving the problem of selfishness and contentious interests through the elimination of private property. Thus where property, inheritance, and marriage are reintroduced as prescribed in the Laws of Platos second best city the patented status of women renders immaterial Platos thw arting with the irrational maintenance of rigid sex roles (Okin, 1979). Given these basic features of the social structure of the city, it is not surprising that Plato, in spite of general pronouncements to the unregenerate, is not able to treat or use women as the equals of his male citizens (Okin, 1979, p. 46). Further, and of magnificence if one is to fairly respect Platos concern for all women, though Republic V validates the notion that female talents may extend to otherwise(a) crafts under the rubric of maximum efficiency, it proffers nothing toward applying this notion to any but those fortunate enough to be of aristocratic decent.Hence, even if we were to absolve Plato of his (perhaps more(prenominal) subtlety) biased inferences observed in conjunction with his emancipation of the female-elite, a blanket(prenominal) feminist portrayal of the great philosopher demands that one reconcile his violently distant views on feminine potential as a function of class.What emer ges is a Platonic specialisation between similarities in the potential range of mens and womens talents and similarities in ability, with the related distinction between comparison of opportunity and equality of outcome. Whereas women share by nature in every way of life just as men do, there exists no pursuit of mankind in which the male sex maintains not the gifts and qualities to a higher degree than the female, save for absurd examples of household production (Republic V, 455c4-d7). This distinction helps to explain why Plato defines male guardians as the best of the citizens and the female guardians as less-than, i.e. the best of the women only (Republic V, 456e1-5). By extension, Plato asserts that the female-guardians despite their having been educated in tandem bicycle with the males will serve as assistants (i.e. secondary companions of sorts) to their male compatriots (Republic V, 471c2-d4). His description of the optimum brigade arrangement, whereby the guardians woul d be less likely to desert each otherif their woman joined their campaigns.positioned in the rear to frighten the enemy, and in field their help should ever be needed indubitably indicates this much, while further implying that men harbor greater capability and potential in state of war than do women (Republic V, 471d1-4). Therefore, in constant reference to the wives of the guardians, and by defining female guardianship in terms of its value to men, Plato betrays the cultural predispositions embedded in language throughout his work. Unsurprisingly, the notion that a woman can do what her fellow man does, but is nonetheless incapable of doing it as well, lies at the heart of feminist objections to Platonic thought.Some suggest that Platos apparent hostility toward women can be explained by appeal to an elitist contempt for a corrupt and inefficient social order under which women fail to see their potential. Vlatos, for example, weds a minimalist and conservative conception of pe rsonal rights that intends to reconcile the equality Plato provides for women with the philosophers negative portrayal of women elsewhere (Vlastos, 1994). On Vlastos account, if Platos policies meditate a belief that equality in the rights of persons shall not be denied or abridged on account of sex a claim that bears contrary to the norms governing the status of Athenian women at the time then Plato is capably characterized as a feminist (Vlastos, 1994, p. 12).On attempting to reconcile the emancipation of the female-elite in Republic V with the reproachful remarks targeted at women as evidenced throughout the broader Platonic corpus Vlastos suggests that the womanish traits Plato denigrates are those of the great mass of women, not of those brilliant exceptions from whom the guardians would be recruited and, moreover, they are the traits common to women now i.e. Platos time, under conditions then prevailing which did not foster the development of energetic minds and resolute characters (Vlastos, 1994, p. 18). Arguably, Vlastos explanation does not merely explain away Platos irreverent tone toward women a tone persistent throughout his works and, notably, targeted at the general female body. Ultimately, Vlastos approach fails to satisfy those who subscribe to a liberationist ethic that values womens preferences and needs for their own sake (Annas, 1976). On this account, Pomeroy calls attention to contempt for women throughout the Platonic texts, either expressed directly, or implied through images and metaphors and points to a proprietary canon that positioned women as property, prizes, and slaves under the custodial care of men (Pomeroy, 1975). Moreover, noting that Platos liberation of women resides within a metaphysical framework in which a womans opportunity to pursue knowledge of the good depends on the intrinsic value of the soul, Annas poses a consistent hostility toward women throughout Platos dialogues. Accordingly, she argues against the femi nist thesis namely pointing to the facts that Plato does not reject inequality between the genders as such, nor does he suggest, in any way, that he genuinely cares for the desires of women, as women (Annas, 1976).Cl aboriginal, the broader Platonic corpus fails to transcend the gender stereotypes and sexist notions that circumscribe its time. However, in so much as Plato gives voice to a class of citizens that remained unsaid for ages barred by the values of a rigid societal score some may deem Plato a revolutionary proponent of female-actualization. While his overall presentation may offend modern feminist sensibilities, Platos policies are attuned to the potential of females in the face of a disparaging cultural opposition. And, although the evidence suggests that Plato does not consider women as the moral equals of men by any measure he nonetheless deserves credit for being among the get-go to promote the equality of women in meaningful aspects of social status and functi on.ReferencesAnnas, Julia. (1976). Platos Republic and Feminism. Philosophy, 51, 307-321.Aristotle. (1995). Aristotle Politics Books I And II. (Trevor Saunders, Trans.). NewYork Oxford University pressure level. (Original work written 350 B.C.E.).Bar On, B. (1994). Engendering Origins Critical Feminist Readings in Plato and Aristotle. New York State University of New York Press.Just, R. (1989). Women in Athenian Law and Life. New York Routledge Press.Okin, S. (1979). Women in Western Political Thought. Princeton Princeton UniversityPressPlato. (1997). Complete work The Republic. (J.M. Cooper D. L. Hutchinson, Eds.).Indianapolis Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.Plato. (1997). Complete Works Timaeus. (J.M. Cooper D. L. Hutchinson, Eds.).Indianapolis Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.Pomeroy, S. (1975). Goddesses, Whores, Wives, and Slaves Women in Classical Antiquity. New York random House, Inc. Vlastos, Gregory. (1994). Was Plato a Feminist? In Nancy Tuana (Ed.), Feminist Interpr etations of Plato (pp. 11-23). University Park, PA Penn State Press.Walmart fooling Low Prices StrategyWalmart Everyday Low Prices StrategyWal-Mart is the worlds largest retailer stores emerged in Arkansas, USA since 1962 by Sam Walton with his belief that the future of retailing lay in discounting, focusing on value drivers charge and service, convenience and a large-minded rage of product all in one store. The madely of implementation is to adapt innovative practice selling the brand with shibboleth Every Day Low Prices (EDLP) mixed with other philosophies into its pricing.In early days, One of the key dodging was concerned on petite township locations open discount stores in scurvy town and spread out its stores and filling un-served gaps avoiding from disceptation radar. As, Wal-Mart saturated its market and effectively barred smart competition.With the prospect of low price policy, Wal-Mart is relentless cost control. Non-stop of reducing of their price parallel wit h cost control. Including of being the partnership with suppliers, they claimed that it helped the suppliers improve scrutinise trouble and efficiency as win-win partnership. Another core competence is logistic management. Wal-Mart very early demonstrated commitment to technology in the industry. Being the soonest to adopt satellite technology connection the chain to one double network. Moreover, Wal-Mart has been seek for the continuing development by adoption RFID in the system.In term of service, Wal-Mart understands the art of motivating its employees from all level to perform their best. For instant, under the ten-foot rule, any member of staff within ten feet of a client must offer them assistance. Its labor relations are exceptional. Workers are not plain employees but associates, eligible for a share of the profits and stress options in the company. This has created a famously loyal and highly agonistical workforce.Now, Wal-Mart is liner a change to their patronage in mainland China. Over the past a couple of(prenominal) years Chinas retail industry and its distribution and logistical nucleotide have opened up significantly with decreased government regulation. For Wal-Mart this will mean a large change in its business outline and it will now look to profitably expand with Chinas booming economy. In order to set a new strategy Wal-Mart will need to let out what issues it will face in the short and long term. One such issue is the fact that the business present used in the States will not directly transplant to China. For example, in the U.S., Wal-Mart places stores in small towns to gain a competitive advantage. China, on the other hand, will not support such a structure. In China, the economic growth has been concentrated exclusively in coastal regions supporting urbanites.The U.S. business model similarly uses Wal-Marts distribution, logistics, and IT networks to gain economies of scale and competitive advantages. China does not have the infrastructure for Wal-Mart to gain the same scale economies and advantages. Instead, Wal-Mart China will need to find alternative ways to turn core competencies into competitive advantages. Other issues Wal-Mart China faces are differences in consumer preferences habits between American and Chinese consumers, increasing competition among foreign and domestic firms, and overcoming local protectionism obstacles.SWOT Analysis of Wal-Mart(S)trengthsWal-Mart is a sinewy retail brand. It has a reputation for value for money, convenience and a wide range of products all in one store.The company has a core competence involving its use of information technology to support its international logistics system.Wal-Mart has a lot of suppliers, since the company claimed that it had always treated its supplier as partners and in any case helps suppliers improve inventory management and efficiency.Wal-Mart has a competitive strategy. For example frequent low prices (EDLP) or Always Low price s, this helped to drive the concept of EDLP and draw a million customers to its door.(W)eaknessThe biggest obstacle Wal-Mart faced in Mainland China was lack of an information-technology network with suppliers making the purchase and distribution difficult.(O)pportunitiesTo take over, merge with, or form strategic alliances with other world(prenominal) retailers, focusing on ad hoc markets such as Europe or the Greater China Region.The stores are currently only trade in a relatively small number of countries. Therefore there are tremendous opportunities for future business in expanding consumer markets.New locations and store types offer Wal-Mart opportunities to exploit market development. They alter from large super centres, to local and mall-based sites.Opportunities exist for Wal-Mart to continue with its current strategy of large, super centres.(T)hreatsVery high competition in chinaware market, especially the local brand.The Buying behavior of Chinese consumers, Chinese c onsumers always equivalence the different of the price before they make a purchase.Regulatory restrictions, in china the constraints on a foreign retailers operation directly curb the regional expansion of Wal-Mart stores and the efficient use of distribution centers.Local protectionism, it is serious-minded problem faced by many multinational firms trying to expand operations through china.The Infrastructural Deficiency, Wal-Mart distribution system depended on transportation, but china transportation were no well connected and were serious fragmented.Case Questions wherefore is Wal-Mart advantageful in the US? What are Wal-Marts competitive advantages and its sources?Wal-Mart has the critical strategy such as Every Day Low Prices (EDLP) to capture demand of consumers and brand reputation and trust of customers make Wal-Mart become outstanding firm. two key developments made the success possibleDistribution Wal-Mart set up highly automated distribution centres, cutting down on spoken language time and costs.Inventory flow The companys computerized inventory systems gave managers real-time information on their stocks, speeding up the re-ordering of goods.The competitive advantages of Wal-Mart are technology, being the earliest to adopt satellite technology connection the chain to one big network. Besides, Wal-Mart has been seeking for the continuing development by adoption RFID in the system. Using the inventory management over the competitors and a lot of suppliers that deal with Wal-Mart. Also, the main successful of Wal-Mart is cost-control. Wal-Mart can control and avoid unnecessary cost very well, therefore Wal-Mart can offers a low price than competitors to consumers as a result of economic of scale.2. Should Wal-Mart replicate its domestic model in its original form in China? Why? Can it build the same competitive advantage in China through its successful domestic model?Wal-Mart should not use the same strategy form in china. Because it is differen t in culture , environment, legal and politics. The original exponent be success in US but the characteristic of Chinese people is on the whole differently from USs people. It is hard to build the competitive as the same as in United state because due to local supplier, distribution or supply chain is not the same as in USA. Also, Wal-Mart might lack of technology in china, so I think the original model might not work in china3. render suggestions on potential strategies that Wal-Mart China should consider in going in advance.Creating GuanxiConducting merchandising expansion research a critical role in global success.It permits the company to take into account different environments, attitude and market conditions and hence to minimize risks.To get information for possible business expansionTo reminder the political climateTo review various ways of marketTo evaluate the business partnersAlternativesWal-Mart has many options when determining what strategy to set going forward in Chinas newly deregulated market. One such option is to accept defeat. Wal-Mart has seek to transplant its American business model in other countries such as Germany, South Korea, and Japan and realized huge failures. Japan is consistently a loss making operation for Wal-Mart, and Wal-Mart has already completely pull back from Germany and South Korea due to its inability to..http//walmartstores.com/AboutUs/297.aspxhttp//news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/325922.stm