Rap Frog And The Tell Tale Heart - 928 Words

The main characters in â€Å"Hop-Frog† and â€Å"The Tell-Tale Heart† endure a vile nature of their own, even though what they committed was for self-uprightness from the external sinister forces. Hop-Frog’s appearance appears to be acquitted and inoffensive in the beginning of the story. However, Hop-Frog’s internal aggression and insanity are ignited due to many extreme external factors such as the king’s abusive power and Trippetta’s humiliation. During the climactic scene, Hop-Frog declares that he can distinct the king and the ministers as beasts for inhumanely degrades him and Trippetta. His statement seems to be proving a point of justice and equality; conversely, his brutal murder of the king and the ministers opposes the idea of bringing justice. Hop-Frog declares, â€Å" ‘I now see distinctly,’ [†¦] ‘what manner of people theses maskers are. They are a great king and his seven privy-councillors, -a king who does not scruple to strike a defenseless girl, and his seven councilors who abet him in the outrage’ † (Poe 1255). Hop-Frog distinctively relates the king and the ministers to a corrupted hierarchical system, which is consisted of a merciless king and irrational ministers who do not bring justice and equality. In the contradiction, Hop-Frog is also the one that performs an act of sin, which he brutally sets the king and the ministers on blazes. â€Å"Hop-Frog† is a story full of irony and twisted scenarios, where the injustice transpires and alters one’s mind that even a righteousShow MoreRelatedSRS11105471 Words   |  22 Pages(super natural) like the mark on the chocolate bar or soft drinks (MC ïÆ'   Montrà ©al Kosher, COR 34)   Magic: There is Magic and Magic(k). The one with the (k) means the magic when you change things or put spell on someone (change your boyfriend to a frog). The person who added the (k) was Aluster (something). Mostly we will be talking about magic(k) in this course. The one without a (k) is the stage magic; the hand is quicker than the eye, entertainment magic (Pull a rabbit out of the hat, cards)

Socrates And Machiavelli Analysis - 936 Words

Socrates instilled value in living life as it ought to be and ingrained the pursuit of truth into all of his actions. He relished living as a gadfly to the state; arousing thoughts in others as a means to bring them to higher points of understanding and critical examination, which they then were to apply to their own society. He wanted people to live lives as they ought to live them and for the state to be a reflection of that aim. The leader advocated by Machiavelli, The Prince, is far more authoritarian and holds entirely different values in comparison to Socrates. The Prince is an individual who maintains complete hegemony over his subjects through nearly any means. The Prince will lie, kill, torture, and manipulate in order to†¦show more content†¦Socrates did what many could never do, he knowingly defied instinct, and chose his values over his own life. From his actions alone we can conclude that Socrates’ ideal leader is one who would act in line with the pursui t of goodness, morality, and truth. A leader appreciated by Socrates would have traits such as introspection, pursuing moral outcomes, and not sticking to a status quo for the sake of it just being generally accepted. Machiavelli, conversely, through The Prince, asserts his end and goal to be power and the use of power to ensure stability. The means towards achieving this end, at least by Socratic standards, are comparably much more immoral. The Prince is liable to retain his power and political status quo through means which could included killing off those who’d oppose him, killing off those whose deaths would be convenient to him, using deceit to reach his desired position, and promoting deception over truth to maintain sovereignty over others. Machiavelli even goes as far as to assert that the priority of the Prince should be instilling fear of him into his constituents rather than love of him and appreciation of his rule. Socratic and Machiavellian valuesShow MoreRelatedSocrates And Machiavelli1681 Words   |  7 PagesSocrates, in his early works, maintained a steadfast distance from involvement in politics, making a comparison or evaluation of a political system in his persona technically impossible. To claim that Socrates would or would not be supportive of any political system might then seem irresponsible, a presumptuous analysis not fitting for an academic recognizing the false equivalence between Socrates’ philosophy and Machiavelli’s political ethics. The strategy to conduct any sort of liable and validRead MorePolitical Theorists, Niccolo Machiavelli And Socrates1630 Words   |  7 PagesPolitical theorists, Niccolo Machiavelli and Socrates, formulated their thoughts in heightened political climates in their respective countries leading to their definitive and explicit opinions surrounding how a governmental system should be run. The government systems proposed by both theorists are vastly different due to what each individual prioritizes in terms of political necessities. Machiavelli’s concept is to describe the means in obtaining power in order to define a political structure thatRead MoreNiccolo Machiavelli And Plato1693 Words   |  7 PagesNicco lo Machiavelli and Socrates (through Plato) have both given the world plenty of advice when it comes to governing. Both men have contributed to the debate of what a ‘prince’, or ruler, should look like. They lived in different time periods but were both surrounded by political uncertainty and fragmentation, which contributed to their views of government. Their ideals of a prince overlap in ways, but overall there are glaring differences in how they think a ‘prince’ should rule. A strong exampleRead MoreMachiavelli And Socrates1840 Words   |  8 Pagesrespective times, Socrates and Niccolà ³ Machiavelli had very different methods and beliefs of how a political system should be run. The mindset of Socrates can be seen in the works Apology and Crito by Plato. Socrates, who values wisdom and justice over power and prestige, would view Machiavelli’s concept of a Prince very contradicting to how he believes a good life should be lived. In his work, The Prince, Machiavelli details how a prince should rule and maintain power. Socrates would not be supportiveRead MoreSocrates Vs Machiavelli Essay875 Words   |  4 PagesSocrates, in his early works, maintained a steadfast distance from involvement in politics, making a comparison or evaluation of a political system in his persona technically impossible. To claim that Socrates would or would not be supportive of any political system might then seem irresponsible, a presumptuous analysis not fitting for an academic recognizing the false equivalence between Socrates’Read MorePolitical And Political Ethics Of A Democratic Society2074 Words   |  9 Pagesreach the position of power in which they can create change. During the initial stages, obtaining the necessary power for transformation is more important than the process in which it is obtained. Between the political phi losophers of Socrates, Rousseau, and Machiavelli, the third preaches these ideas, which are the most likely to inspire political change. After detailing the positive and negative aspects of each philosopher’s ideas for creating political change, this essay will assert that one mustRead MoreEssay about Ethical Decision Making3074 Words   |  13 Pageswhere he doesnt belong. He wants to belong! Orwells basis for decision making is geared towards Burmese approval. Orwells thinking, as recorded in this essay, is very similar to that of Machiavelli. Both men believe that it is better to be respected by others than to have respect for oneself. (Machiavelli,56) Machiavellis main concern for governing the people is to keep their faith and thus in return, the people will stay under his rule. (59) This is how Orwell thinks when he decides to killRead MoreEssay on The Role Of Women in the Renaissance1645 Words   |  7 Pagesseemingly characteristic Renaissance intellectual and cultural developments were in fact revivals of classical ideas, debates and traditions. He asserts that Petrarchs rejection of knowledge... irrelevant to man was based on Ciceros portrait of Socrates, who was said to have turned against intellectual speculation in favor of knowing how to live well (39). Ciceros and Plinys reverence for Greek antiquity was a model for the Renaissance humanists own revival of the classical past (34). PicosRead MoreSchool Leadership Roles An d Responsibilities10143 Words   |  41 PagesAncient Greece leaders like Socrates had a different mindset. Socrates believed that there are universal, objective, and permanent truths in the areas of morality, character, and ethics. Socrates believed that these truths could be discerned by inductive reasoning. The belief in universal values and principles, and that morality and morals are based on reasoning from these universal values and principles were at the roots of Socrates’ teachings and inductive reasoning. Socrates saw morality as an exerciseRead MoreCultural Relativism And Anti Foundationalism1556 Words   |  7 Pagessubjective nature of truth in ethics are both apparent. For example, if standards are independent of culture, there would be more agreement among people around the world, like the agreements made in science and math. Ethics are not as definitive. Machiavelli might support this argument that, in most cases, the ends justify the means. Using perspective , understanding a society’s history or politics, helps in understanding individual actions or values. Individuals that observe the values of people in

Discuss the positive and negative aspects of kants Essay Example For Students

Discuss the positive and negative aspects of kants Essay idea of League of NationsAlong the years, we have witnessed in recent decades the ongoing globalization of world trade, followed by vast rates of investment, and witnessed a new interdependence of the global economic system. The income gap is growing at an unstoppable rate, both within countries and between developed and developing countries. This resulted in making poor people more poorer and rich people richer. There are many views and objectives of development. Long time ago, Kant believed in an idea for all the countries to united and have a similar history. Man through the help of nature developed into what we are now. At first we didnt have the vast technology that we have now so we used nature to develop. Every individual man would have to live for a vast length of time if he were to learn how to make complete use of all his natural capacities (Kant, 57). We could apply this now to the theory of Ricardo of comparative advantage. Where every nation should concentrate on what it produces the best and provides it to the world. This will provide the world with better goods and service because each country will be specialized it what it do best. If we live in a society every person could share his own thoughts of how to develop and improve so we leave much space for innovation. However, at the same time others believe that if a person works alone he always tries to become the best so he tries to be simply the best. Its true that people work best under the supervision of a higher power in other words a master. However this master should not forget the other person is a human and he has rights. For example, many multinationals are successful because they have good leadership so if we adapt t his to nations. I guess we would live in a better world. However the problem is who should lead the world? Defiantly it will be a human being so will he succeed? I guess if the United Nations was given more power in solving national and internationals problems we would be living in a better world. However now the United Nations is under the control of a couple of nation, who have the veto right, mainly the United States. But to live in better world each country should have equal power in the united nations and for example Sudan should have the same vote power if the united states so as we could improve and share the same history. I agree with kants idea of living in a society of freedom with laws because the definition of freedom is different from one person to another. One person could walk naked in the streets and say I am free and consider that this is his right. But laws must govern freedom so as not the world to go wild or to make evil part of humans to control them. To conclude, the globalized world we are living in today developing countries are developing a slow rate and maybe this is because developed nations are happy at the situation as it is now. This is because they use the developing countries as markets for them to sell their own products. Also its giving the developed world the opportunity to control the world specially the united states, which believes that is the master of the world. It is clear that kants ideas have started the idea of globalization thousands of years before it started. Now we are using some of his ideas to live. .uf892f8a72309338c62a4999f905f08a4 , .uf892f8a72309338c62a4999f905f08a4 .postImageUrl , .uf892f8a72309338c62a4999f905f08a4 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .uf892f8a72309338c62a4999f905f08a4 , .uf892f8a72309338c62a4999f905f08a4:hover , .uf892f8a72309338c62a4999f905f08a4:visited , .uf892f8a72309338c62a4999f905f08a4:active { border:0!important; } .uf892f8a72309338c62a4999f905f08a4 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .uf892f8a72309338c62a4999f905f08a4 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .uf892f8a72309338c62a4999f905f08a4:active , .uf892f8a72309338c62a4999f905f08a4:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .uf892f8a72309338c62a4999f905f08a4 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .uf892f8a72309338c62a4999f905f08a4 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .uf892f8a72309338c62a4999f905f08a4 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .uf892f8a72309338c62a4999f905f08a4 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .uf892f8a72309338c62a4999f905f08a4:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .uf892f8a72309338c62a4999f905f08a4 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .uf892f8a72309338c62a4999f905f08a4 .uf892f8a72309338c62a4999f905f08a4-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .uf892f8a72309338c62a4999f905f08a4:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: All Quiet On The Western Front (1266 words) EssayBibliography:

The Ionian Revolt Essay Sample free essay sample

Significance of the Ionian rebellion as a consequence of the Iranian wars. The Ionian Revolt which began in 499BC was the beginning of a concatenation of events that changed the ancient universe. and constituted the first major struggle between Greece and the Persian Empire. It was chiefly of significance as the causative agent of the Greco-Persian Wars. which included the two invasions of Greece and the celebrated conflicts of Marathon. Thermopylae and Salamis. Ionian metropoliss revolted to derive independency from both stamp downing systems. the Iranian Empire and dictatorship. nevertheless. the rebellion ended in failure. and significant losingss. both stuff and economic. However. Miletus aside. they recovered comparatively rapidly and prospered under Iranian regulation for the following 40 old ages. For the Persians. the rebellion was important in pulling them into an drawn-out struggle with the provinces of Greece which would last for 50 old ages. over which clip they would prolong considerable losingss. We will write a custom essay sample on The Ionian Revolt Essay Sample or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Ionia was the name of a part in Asia Minor in which many Greek settlements had been founded and the Grecian civilization established. Croesus. King of Lydia conquered Ionia merely to be overthrown by the Iranian male monarch. Cyrus in 547BC. Under the regulation of the Persians. the Ionian Greeks had to pay one-year testimonials and take part in Iranian military runs. Local autocrats appointed by the Persians were set up as swayers of the Ionian metropoliss. Aristagoras. the autocrat of Miletus. tidal bore to increase his wealth and power and to ingratiate himself with the Persians. convinced the Persians that they should assail Naxos. Aristagoras sided with the blue bloods from Naxos who were acute to recover control over the island. The Persians were interested in being involved in this run because Naxos had a high strategic value in their enlargements programs. The failure of the Naxian expedition. and the quarrelling between Aristagoras and the Iranian general put him in a unsafe place. The lone manner to salvage his place was to get down a rebellion. The privation to determine power. glorification and the control over provinces may be the accelerator for warfare to interrupt loose. It was Aristagoras’ personal will and power that started the rebellion but besides the Ionian desire of freedom. political reforms and economic prosperity which continued it for six old ages. The Ionians called for aid from mainland Greece but merely Athens and Eretria responded. Athens sent 20 ships and Eretria sent four. Sparta was loath to do committednesss far from place. The assistance from mainland Greece was non plenty as the several metropoliss and islands of Ionia had to contend against eternal resources of the Persian Empire. nevertheless the Ionians were finally suppressed in 494BC. Another ground for the failure of the Ionians was their deficiency of administration and subject where they fought non as a common integrity but as a group of provinces all with their single involvements. Darius. the male monarch of Persia now wanted retribution. His purpose was to recapture lost Ionian metropoliss and re-establish Persian domination. This undertaking he entrusted to Mardonius ( his boy in jurisprudence ) . who assembled a big fleet and ground forces in 492BC and sailed along Ionian seashore to Hellespont. He deposed Ionian autocrats and replaced them with democracies. When Darius was told that the Athenians had helped the Ionians to fire Sardis. capital on one portion of the Empire in 496BC. he purportedly said. â€Å"Who are they? † and had a slave Tell him three times a twenty-four hours â€Å"Remember the Athenians. † After the failed effort to reconquer Thrace and Macedon in readying for an onslaught on Athens. in 490BC. the Persians reached Euboea and Eretria was the first to be attacked. The metropolis was sacked and burned. Herodotus states that the temples were burnt in retaliation for the burned temples of Sardis. and dwellers were carried off as captives. Hippias ( former autocrat of Athens ) suggested their following halt be Marathon. in which this proved Athenians were a important military force in the Aegean and on the Grecian mainland. The Battle of Marathon 490BC showed a important clang of the East against the West and demonstrated the exposure of the Persian Empire. The Iranian licking unified the Greeks against the Persians and therefore. giving them assurance ; having much honor and glorification for their licking of ‘the barbarian’ . The Athenians attacked with strong wings and a relatively weak Centre wining in taking the enemy by surprise and ensuing in triumph. Marathon loomed big in the Athenian mind. which work forces were regarded as heroes. A war memorial consisting of 2 burial hills was established at site of conflict. 1 for 192 Athenians and 1 for fallen Plataeans Thucydides says this was a most unusual pattern. Normally those who died in war were given a public funeral â€Å"except those at Marathon as they judged their heroism to be outstanding they made their grave on the spot† . This triumph earned the Athenians prestigiousness in the Grecian universe and boosted the repute of the democracy. The Grecian triumph of Battle of Marathon indicated there would be more struggle in the hereafter. given the aggressive nature of the Persian Empire. The Persians had non given up and farther runs to suppress Greece had been failures ; as the Battle of Salamis and Plataea were to ensue in farther triumphs for the Greeks. These consequences was a turning point in war as the Persian fleet was mostly destroyed ; their scheme of combined land and sea operation was impossible as Persia’s supply line was broken. The trueness of Ionian Greeks was weakened as without a naval forces. the Persians could non keep control of Ionia. However. even though the Greeks had suffered losingss. at the conflict of Thermopylae the Greek military personnels made a concluding heroic base and showed singular selflessness in detaining the Persians. Systematically. it is hard to pull excessively many decisions from the Ionian Revolt. salvage for what the Greeks and Persians may ( or may non ) have learnt about each other. Surely. the Athenians. and Greeks in general. seem to hold been impressed by the power of Iranian horse. with the Grecian ground forcess exposing considerable cautiousness during the undermentioned runs when confronted by the Iranian horse. Conversely. the Persians seem non to hold realised or noticed the potency of the Grecian hoplites as heavy foot. At the Battle of Marathon. in 490 BC. the Persians took small attentiveness of a chiefly hoplitic ground forces. ensuing in their licking. Furthermore. despite the possibility of enrolling heavy foot from their spheres. the Persians began the 2nd invasion of Greece without making so. and once more encountered major jobs in the face of Grecian ground forcess. It is possible that. given the easiness of their triumphs over the Greeks at Ephesus. and likewise armed forces at the conflicts of the Marsyas River and Labraunda. the Persians merely disregarded the military value of the hoplite phalanx — to their cost.